Opsal v. United Services Automobile Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in the context of other exclusions such as earthquakes and volcanic eruptions, the earth movement exclusion must only apply to naturally occurring earth movement
• holding that in the context of other exclusions such as earthquakes and volcanic eruptions, the earth movement exclusion must only apply to naturally occurring earth movement
• stating that earth movement exclusion can be reasonably read to apply only to naturally occurring earth movement
• although court declined to follow dicta in footnote of California Supreme Court decision, the court felt “constrained to say the Supreme Court’s footnote suggestion was not ‘unreasonable’ and provided ‘proper cause’ to support [defendant’s] denial of coverage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).