· 2/25/1957
Oppenheimer v. General Cable Corp.
Citations
- 352 U.S. 1010
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that neither the Eighth Circuit nor the District Court had “ ‘jurisdiction to inquire into the merits’ ” because the Act’s “statute of lim- itations is jurisdictional”
- noting that neither the Eighth Circuit nor the District Court had “ ‘jurisdiction to inquire into the merits’ ” because the Act’s “statute of lim- itations is jurisdictional”
- reversing the district court’s “tract-by- tract” approach to assessing the government’s claim to ownership rights where the -13- government’s claim of interest in every tract was premised on a single legal theory
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.