Skip to main content
· 4/10/2015

Oplus Technologies, Ltd. v. Vizio, Inc.

Citations

  • 782 F.3d 1371
  • 114 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1413
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 5800
  • 2015 WL 1600056

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding litigation misconduct where the plaintiff “strategically amend[ed] its claims to manufacture venue” in a district that had “only the most tenuous basis in its initial complaint for bringing suit” in that venue
  • the protections described in Afroyim apply “only to acts committed after citizenship”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, O'Malley, Prost

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.