Skip to main content
· 12/15/2014

Opiyo v. Musgrave

Citations

  • 135 S. Ct. 880
  • 190 L. Ed. 2d 711
  • 83 U.S.L.W. 3365
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 8395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that where a party does not prosecute its case, court should “fashion a sanction appropriate to the circumstances” and “[o]nly rarely would a sanction of final termination of the case be appropriate”
  • “Our continuance rule leaves control of docket management with the courts.”
  • “Our continuance rule leaves control of docket management with the courts.”
  • “Our continuance rule leaves control of docket management with the courts.”
  • “Our continuance rule leaves control of docket management with the courts.”
  • leaving control of docket management with courts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.