· 12/15/2014
Opiyo v. Musgrave
Citations
- 135 S. Ct. 880
- 190 L. Ed. 2d 711
- 83 U.S.L.W. 3365
- 2014 U.S. LEXIS 8395
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that where a party does not prosecute its case, court should “fashion a sanction appropriate to the circumstances” and “[o]nly rarely would a sanction of final termination of the case be appropriate”
- “Our continuance rule leaves control of docket management with the courts.”
- “Our continuance rule leaves control of docket management with the courts.”
- “Our continuance rule leaves control of docket management with the courts.”
- “Our continuance rule leaves control of docket management with the courts.”
- leaving control of docket management with courts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.