Skip to main content
· 12/22/1877

Opinions of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court

Citations

  • 68 Me. 582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial court erred by prohibiting a defendant from asking the venire panel members whether they could consider the possibility of a fact that the defendant intended to explore at trial, where the question was not otherwise improper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.