Skip to main content
· 8/10/1976

Opinion No. Oag 53-76, (1976)

Citations

  • 65 Op. Att'y Gen. 142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a district court is not permit- ted under section 7 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 7, to enforce an arbitrator’s order compelling pre-hearing document discovery from a non-party to the arbitration
  • “[S]ection 7 of the FAA does not grant arbitrators the power to order third parties to produce documents prior to an arbitration hearing.”
  • “Given the clear statutory language, we reject the proposition that section 7 grants arbitrators implicit powers to order document discovery from third parties prior to a hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: BRONSON C. La FOLLETTE, Attorney General

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.