Opinion No. Oag 28-75, (1975)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not err by overruling reliability objection
• finding district court did not err in relying on victim’s statements as evidence because the defendant “himself corroborated the . . . statements and effectively admitted to the crime”
• ‘‘[t]he [D]istrict [C]ourt may consider uncharged, dis- missed, and even acquitted conduct at sentencing’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).