Opinion No. Oag 2-78, (1978)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the tenth-digit statistical suffixes . . . are not statutory,” as those suffixes are not incorporated in the HTSUS’s legal text
• explaining that “the tenth-digit statistical suffixes . . . are not statutory,” as those suffixes are not incorporated in the HTSUS’s legal text
• establishing that “[t]he tenth-digit statistical suffixes . . . are not statutory.”
• noting the CIT’s “expertise in international trade matters, including classi- fication rulings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).