Opinion No. 80-042

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s mere objections, “without more,” were not competent evidence to rebut the district court’s findings
• denying Ayika’s “Motion to Vacate or Set Aside Order of Motion to Dismiss Indictment” and “Motion for Reconsideration [of Motion] to Dismiss Indictment”
• denying Ayika’s “Motion to Vacate or Set Aside Order of Motion to Dismiss Indictment” and “Motion for Reconsideration [of Motion] to Dismiss Indictment”
• involving multiple continuances requested by the defendant where the district court “expressly stated . . . [its] reasons for finding that the interests of justice outweighed the defendant’s and the public’s interests in a speedy trial”
• involving multiple continuances requested by the defendant where the district court “expressly stated . . . [its] reasons for finding that the interests of justice outweighed the defendant’s and the public’s interests in a speedy trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).