Skip to main content
· 4/15/1980

Opinion No. 79-313b (1980) Ag

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that successor liability can attach in the absence of a sale so long as there exists a continuation of the same corporate entity and the successor controls the assets of the predecessor.
  • discussing an \exception to the requirement that suits alleging wrongs against a corporation be brought derivatively\
  • discussing an “exception to the requirement that suits alleging wrongs against a corporation be brought derivatively”
  • reading Daley as about “the requirement of derivative suits” (quoting Daley, 26 A.3d at 729)
  • noting plaintiffs “‘alleg[ing] a ‘special injury’ to themselves apart from that suffered by the corporation’” as an “exception to the requirement that suits alleging wrongs against a corporation be brought derivatively” (quoting Labovitz, 172 F.3d at 901)
  • listing the defendants in that case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: JAN ERIC CARTWRIGHT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.