Opinion No. 78-178 (1978) Ag

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding because the later grant by the RO \was only able to grant service connection\ effective the date of the second claim
• reversing the Board's finding that a report of a phone conversation was a valid withdrawal of appeal because there was \considerable evidence\ that a withdrawal was not intended
• applying the DeLisio standard and concluding that there had been no effective withdrawal of a claim for sleep apnea because the veteran had not unambiguously stated that he wished to withdraw that claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).