Skip to main content
· 1/31/1978

Opinion No. 77-283 (1978) Ag

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that those circumstances were insufficient to support a determination of probable cause
  • affirming suppression of evidence where only connection between fatal armed robbery and defendant's cellphone was affiant's assertion cellphones are \necessary to social interactions\
  • seizure justified where police have substantial basis for concluding that item seized contains evidence connected to crime under investigation
  • officer's opinion that coventurers communicate with cell phones not sufficient to establish probable cause to search
  • \the government must demonstrate a nexus between the crime alleged and the article to be searched or seized\ [quotations and citation omitted]
  • evidence of suspect's location a component of probable cause analysis if it would be helpful in proving crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.