Opinion No. 75-327 (1976) Ag

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that we must ask whether any “legitimate goal” was served by the prison conditions and whether the conditions are “reasonably related” to that goal
• stating that “[a] pretrial detainee . . . may not be punished for his misconduct while in prison unless he is given a due process hearing
• “[w]e hold that … [plaintiff pretrial detainee] was entitled to the due process protections enshrined in Wolff before being placed in disciplinary segregation”
• “[w]e hold that … [plaintiff pretrial detainee] was entitled to the due process protections enshrined in Wolff before being placed in disciplinary segregation”
• “To [overcome qualified immunity], the plaintiff must: (1) allege facts that establish that the officer violated his constitutional rights; and (2
• “Sandin leaves intact [Wolfish]’s holding that a detainee may not be punished prior to an adjudication of guilt in accordance with due process of law.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).