Skip to main content
· 8/29/1974

Opinion No. 73-326 (1974) Ag

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Court of Common Pleas did not abuse its discretion by denying BAA motion to quash where appellant did not file a brief but stated the reasons for his appeal at oral argument
  • motion to quash for violation of trial court's scheduling order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.