Opinion No. 71-171 (1971) Ag

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing some ambiguity in Eleventh Circuit precedent on the issue
• “The rule ... is that, when it is ‘not apparent’ from the arbitrator’s stated reasoning (or lack thereof
• “The outcome in this case depends on whether we characterize the arbitrator’s decision as an interpretation of the collective bargaining agreement or a modification of it.”
• “The arbitrator acts within her authority when she even arguably interprets a contract, and she exceeds her authority when she modifies the contract’s clear and unambiguous terms.”
• “[A]n arbitrator’s award that appears contrary to the express terms of the agreement may nevertheless be valid if it is premised upon reliable evidence of the parties’ intent.”
• “If we determine that the arbitrator (even arguably) interpreted the parties’ contract, we must end [our] inquiry and deny . . . a motion for vacatur.” (alterations in original) (quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).