Skip to main content
· 8/6/1970

Opinion No. 70-204 (1970) Ag

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where the appellate court vacated a breach of contract judgment and required reentry of judgment for unjust enrichment, prejudgment interest at the higher rate was properly awarded through the date of the judgment on remand
  • “Other decisions of lower courts in the Virgin Islands have stated that awarding prejudgment interest is discretionary. . . . We are not bound by those decisions, and we find them . . . mistaken.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.