· 8/6/1970
Opinion No. 70-204 (1970) Ag
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where the appellate court vacated a breach of contract judgment and required reentry of judgment for unjust enrichment, prejudgment interest at the higher rate was properly awarded through the date of the judgment on remand
- “Other decisions of lower courts in the Virgin Islands have stated that awarding prejudgment interest is discretionary. . . . We are not bound by those decisions, and we find them . . . mistaken.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.