Opinion No. 69-290 (1969) Ag

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a verdict was truly inconsistent where the jury found the defendant guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon on a person over sixty- five but also made a special finding that the defendant did not possess a firearm5
• holding that a verdict was truly inconsistent where the jury found the defendant guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon on a person over sixty- five but also made a special finding that the defendant did not possess a firearm5
• finding a charge and a special finding directly negating a necessary element of that charge to be “legally interlocking”
• finding a charge and a special finding directly negating a necessary element of that charge to be “legally interlocking”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).