· 5/21/1969
Opinion No. 69-202 (1969) Ag
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that filing of complaint with D.C. Office of Human Rights did not toll statute of limitations as to religious retaliation claim because the complaint did not raise any such claim
- holding that filing of complaint with D.C. Office of Human Rights did not toll statute of limitations as to religious retaliation claim because the complaint did not raise any such claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.