Opinion No. 69-197 (1969) Ag

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reading statutes on same subject matter in dif- ferent part of statutory scheme harmoniously ‘‘to ensure the coherency of our construction’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• reading statutes on same subject matter in dif- ferent part of statutory scheme harmoniously ‘‘to ensure the coherency of our construction’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• trial court properly modified award to cor- rect ‘‘material miscalculations of figures and mistakes that did not affect the merits of the controversy’’ (emphasis added)
• court must read statutes together when they relate to same subject matter because legislature presumed to create harmonious and consistent body of law
• sub- mission is unrestricted unless otherwise agreed to by parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).