Opinion No. 69-122 (1969) Ag

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an appellate court cannot “reweigh the equities or reassess the facts” when reviewing for an abuse of discretion
• explaining that courts may consider documents attached to a complaint when determining whether a plaintiff states a plausible claim for relief
• stating that the facial sufficiency of the complaint must generally be made “without resort to matters outside the pleadings”
• noting that a court may consider a complaint’s attachments on a motion to dismiss
• explaining that we ordinarily assess the factual sufficiency of a complaint without looking outside the pleadings, but if we do look outside them, we treat a motion to dismiss as one for summary judgment
• explaining that a court “may consider exhibits attached to the complaint”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).