Opinion No. 68-157 (1968) Ag

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the trial judge \would have been well within her discretion to exclude all reference to the § 510(k) clearance . . . because of its potential to mislead the jury and confuse the issues\
• noting that the trial judge \would have been well within her discretion to exclude all reference to the § 510(k) clearance . . . because of its potential to mislead the jury and confuse the issues\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).