Opinion No. 55-0414

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a default termination could not be construed to be a final decision on the contractor’s breach-of-contract claims because those claims had not been presented to the CO
• dismissing breach-of-contract claims because the defaulted contractor’s letters to the CO contesting the termination did not “assert a claim for damages for breach of contract in a sum certain” and thus failed to satisfy the CDA’s presentment requirement
• For this reason, and those others mentioned, “[n]o other court has adopted the [minority’s] reasoning . . .; indeed, every court to consider [the minority view] on this point has disagreed with and declined to follow it.” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).