Opinion No. (1991) Ag

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding law of the case doctrine applied when the evidence considered on the first appeal was “the same evidence before us now”
• trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to admit evidence on issue barred by the law of the case doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).