Operation Badlaw, Inc. v. Licking County General Health District Board of Health

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that court's research disclosed no case extending the right to privacy as far as the right to smoke either in public or in private
• finding no cases “extending the right to privacy as far as the right to smoke either in public or in private”
• \A facially constitutional regulation does not become unconstitutional because it might be applied unconstitutionally.\
• \A facially constitutional regulation does not become unconstitutional because it might be applied unconstitutionally.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).