Skip to main content
· 2/2/1998

Federal Case

Citations

  • 135 F.3d 671
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 1169
  • 28 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1333
  • 42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,251
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 846
  • 4 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 600
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 1363

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the relationship between ERISA and a third party guarantor “too tenuous, remote, or peripheral” to trigger ERISA’s preemption clause
  • A preemption factor is “whether the state law regulates certain ERISA relationships ....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.