Oparaji v. ABN Amro Mtge. Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he Legislature did not explicitly provide that subsection (g) applied retroactively, i.e., to those convicted of sex offenses prior to 2002,” but “[i]nstead . . . provided subsection (g) would be ‘effect[ive] immediately.’” (second alteration in original
• “[T]he Legislature did not explicitly provide that subsection (g) applied retroactively, i.e., to those convicted of sex offenses prior to 2002,” but “[i]nstead . . . provided subsection (g) would be ‘effect[ive] immediately.’” (second alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).