Op. Atty. Gen. 379c-8c

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that trial court did not err in determining length of interview by length of “substantive questioning” rather than by length of overall interaction with police
• acknowledging that interview “in a small interview room, with the door closed, and with the defendant in the chair furthest from the door” weighed in favor of a finding of custody
• contrasting accusatory questioning weighing in favor of custody from questioning that may lawfully occur during investigatory stop
• fact that “questioning took place at the police station” weighed in favor of custody finding
• “[T]wo conditions must be met before Miranda warnings are required: (1) the suspect must be ‘in custody’; and (2) he must be subject to ‘interrogation.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).