Ooida Risk Retention Group, Inc. v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing exception to the general rule that extrinsic evidence cannot be used in conjunction with the eight-corners rule
• recognizing exception to the general rule that extrinsic evidence cannot be used in conjunction with the eight-corners rule
• finding that the underlying complaint did not establish a person's role at the time of an accident, therefore requiring consideration of extrinsic evidence
• considering extrinsic evidence to determine whether deceased was tandem truck driver because coverage depended on applicability of fellow-employee exclusion
• recognizing this favorable treatment, applying the test, and considering extrinsic evidence
• following the Guidance and holding that a driver was not a named insured under the endorsement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).