OO v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the accused was not entitled under the Jencks Act to statements recorded on audiotape when the tapes were transcribed and there was “no indication whatsoever of substantive differences between the taped versions . . . and the typewritten reports signed by the agents”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).