Skip to main content
· 9/17/2009

Onyiah v. St. Cloud State University

Citations

  • 655 F. Supp. 2d 948
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85327
  • 2009 WL 2974738

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[a] Motion to Dismiss can be converted to a Rule 56 Motion for Summary Judgment if matters outside the pleadings are presented to and not excluded by the court” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “[A] work environment in which co-workers or supervisors criticize, taunt, or harass another employee, does not present the egregious conduct required for an IIED claim.”
  • “[A] complainant must file a charge within 300 days from the date of the alleged unlawful employment action.”
  • “A Title VII plaintiff generally does not exhaust her administrative remedies unless she complains of the discriminatory behavior to the EEOC before filing a lawsuit.”
  • “[A]s a general proposition, if a defendant files a Motion to Dismiss, and the plaintiff later files an Amended Complaint, the amended pleading renders the defendant’s motion to dismiss moot.”
  • “[A]s a general proposition, if a defendant files a Motion to Dismiss, and the plaintiff later files an Amended Complaint, the amended pleading renders the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss moot.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James M. Rosenbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.