· 6/30/2008
Ontiveros v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.
Citations
- 164 Cal. App. 4th 494
- 79 Cal. Rptr. 3d 471
- 2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 964
- 103 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1300
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding arbitration agreement substantively unconscionable because it allowed for only one deposition absent a showing of substantial need
- substantial need but much less discovery of right than afforded by the CarMax agreement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kline
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.