Skip to main content
· 4/27/1995

Ono v. Itoyama

Citations

  • 884 F. Supp. 892
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6092
  • 1995 WL 262539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding antagonism where plaintiff and defendant held equal shares in company and were co-directors of the company, but the defendant had gained control of the corporation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lifland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.