Onilude v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that presence meant physical presence and not “within sight and call”
• upholding § 2Dl.l(b)(l) enhancement where guns were found in house and drugs were buried in yard
• “Although there is no Confrontation Clause right at sentencing, this right is applicable to the other stages of trial.”
• evidence of drug operation after the end of the alleged conspiracy was not extrinsic because it “demonstrated the continuing nature of the organization, the structure of the organization, and the continuing contact” between relevant actors
• “[T]here is no Confrontation Clause right at sentencing . . . .”
• “Evidence that is ‘inextricably intertwined’ with the evidence used to prove the crime 6 charged . . . is admissible so that the jury may evaluate all the circumstances under which the defendant acted.” (internal quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).