O'Niell v. Guyther
Citations
- 123 La. 100
- 48 So. 759
- 1909 La. LEXIS 679
Syllabus
<p>1. Contracts (§ 324*) — Actions tor Services —Nature and Form.</p> <p>Where plaintiff sued on a specific contract for services, and alleged that they were worth the price agreed upon, held, that the suit is on the contract and not on a quantum meruit.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Contracts, Dec. Dig. § 324.*]</p> <p>2. Evidence (§ 584*) — Sufficiency—Number of Witnesses.</p> <p>A parol contract for services exceeding $500 may be proved by the testimony of one credible witness, and corroborative circumstances tending to show a contract of employment, •tlie performance of valuable services, and promises of remuneration. Civ. Code, art. 2277.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Evidence, ■Cent. Dig. § 2427; Dec. Dig. § 584.*]</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a plaintiff sufficiently created a genuine dispute of fact regarding her conspiracy claim by presenting evidence that police officers had a brief conversation prior to allegedly violating her Fourth Amendment rights
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Land
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.