Skip to main content
· 7/18/2005

Onie Mae Ward v. Reginald Moore Mike Russell Ollie Collins

Citations

  • 414 F.3d 968
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14424
  • 2005 WL 1661428

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that plaintiff’s second amended complaint is the equivalent to an affidavit and can serve as plaintiff’s response to defendants’ summary judgment motion because it was verified under penalty of perjury
  • concluding that plaintiff’s second amended complaint is the equivalent to an affidavit and can serve as plaintiff’s response to defendants’ summary judgment motion because it was verified under penalty of perjury
  • concluding that plaintiff’s second amended complaint is the equivalent to an affidavit and can serve as plaintiff’s response to defendants’ summary judgment motion because it was verified under penalty of perjury
  • concluding that plaintiff’s second amended complaint is the equivalent to an affidavit and can serve as plaintiff’s response to defendants’ summary judgment motion because it was verified under penalty of perjury
  • noting that the district court considered a post-deadline summary judgment motion because the motion asserted a defense in response to post-deadline amendments to the complaint, which the moving party could not have previously raised
  • providing a verified complaint made under threat of perjury “is the equivalent of an affidavit and can serve as [a plaintiff’s] response to [a] defendant’s summary judgment motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Hansen, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.