Onick v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the appeal from a final judgment draws in question all prior non-final orders and rulings” (citation to quoted case omitted)
• explaining that standard set forth in Drinkwater, a Title VII case, applies to Section 1981 cases
• reviewing unspecified summary judgment order only insofar as it included a claim that was \inextricably meshed\ with claim in the specified summary judgment order
• exercising jurisdiction over unspecified order because finality doctrine barred plaintiff from appealing that order until after the entry of final judgment
• reviewing unspecified summary judgment order only insofar as it included a claim that was “inextricably meshed” with claim in the specified summary judgment order
• exercising jurisdiction over unspecified order because finality doctrine barred plaintiff from appealing that order until after the entry of final judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).