Ong Ex Rel. Ong IRA v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing claims based on post-purchase statements because “price at which Plaintiffs purchased their debt securities on June 21, 2002 could not have been affected by statements made after that date”
• \The fact that they have filed a class action lawsuit that includes putative class members who did purchase the relevant securities does not confer the necessary standing in this case because none of those putative class members is a named plaintiff.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).