O'NEILL v. Zoning Bd. of Adj.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a dimensional variance for two and one half times the floor space permitted by the Ordinance was not a mere superficial and technical deviation from the terms of the Ordinance and, therefore, that the applicant's appropriate remedy was a rezoning of the property
• holding that a dimensional variance for two and one half times the floor space permitted by the Ordinance was not a mere superficial and technical deviation from the terms of the Ordinance and, therefore, that the applicant’s appropriate remedy was a rezoning of the property
• suggesting that the applicant should request “a rezoning and not a variance”
• suggesting that the applicant should request “a rezoning and not a variance”
• declaring “that the quantum of proof required to establish unnecessary hardship is indeed lesser when a dimensional variance, as opposed to a use variance, is sought”
• a variance will not be granted solely because the applicant will suffer an economic hardship if he does not receive one

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).