Skip to main content
· 5/18/1998

O'Neill v. Simpson

Citations

  • 958 P.2d 1121
  • 1998 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2406
  • 1998 Colo. LEXIS 395
  • 1998 WL 251429

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on United States Supreme Court precedent to hold that a party who had the opportunity to litigate subject-matter jurisdiction is barred from raising those jurisdictional defects on collateral attack
  • relying on United States Supreme Court precedent to hold that a party who had the opportunity to litigate subject-matter jurisdiction is barred from raising those jurisdictional defects on collateral attack
  • requiring “final judgment on the merits” for claim preclusion to apply
  • “[C]laim preclusion[] bars subsequent claims by identical parties based on the same claim for relief after there has been a final judgment on the merits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kourlis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.