O'Neill v. O'Neill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[0]nce it is established that marital labor was used, the burden falls to the party claiming that the increase is nonmarital to establish whether any part of the increase was the result of passive market conditions and, thus, is exempt from equitable distribution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nichols v. Nichols
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-27· cited 22×
• Augoshe v. Lehman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-10· cited 14×
• Mathers v. Brown
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-09· cited 11×
• Yitzhari v. Yitzhari
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-27· cited 9×
• Steele v. Steele
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-20· cited 6×
• Gromet v. Jensen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-10-14· cited 5×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kovalchick v. Kovalchick
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-09· cited 24×
• Young v. Young
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-29· cited 23×