Skip to main content
· 7/2/1918

O'Neill v. Odd Fellows Home

Citations

  • 89 Or. 382
  • 174 P. 148
  • 1918 Ore. LEXIS 134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that an agency's \parrot[ing]\ of statutory language in an affidavit was non-dispositive in the court's specificity determination
  • determining that an agency’s “parrot[ing]” of statutory language in an affidavit was non- dispositive in the court’s specificity determination
  • finding that agency properly asserted Exemption 3 to shield disclosure of records that fell under § 6103 and declining to order redactions
  • noting that the Court need not reach whether the records were properly withheld under Exemption 6 after determining that Exemption 3 was applicable to the records
  • declining to determine “whether propositions that were neither factual nor legal qualified as ‘data’ ”
  • granting Skidmore deference to an agency’s interpretation of a statute advanced during litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bean, Johns, McBride, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.