· 7/2/1918
O'Neill v. Odd Fellows Home
Citations
- 89 Or. 382
- 174 P. 148
- 1918 Ore. LEXIS 134
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that an agency's \parrot[ing]\ of statutory language in an affidavit was non-dispositive in the court's specificity determination
- determining that an agency’s “parrot[ing]” of statutory language in an affidavit was non- dispositive in the court’s specificity determination
- finding that agency properly asserted Exemption 3 to shield disclosure of records that fell under § 6103 and declining to order redactions
- noting that the Court need not reach whether the records were properly withheld under Exemption 6 after determining that Exemption 3 was applicable to the records
- declining to determine “whether propositions that were neither factual nor legal qualified as ‘data’ ”
- granting Skidmore deference to an agency’s interpretation of a statute advanced during litigation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bean, Johns, McBride, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.