Skip to main content
· 9/20/1989

O'NEILL v. Davis

Citations

  • 721 F. Supp. 1013
  • 11 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1817
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11530
  • 1989 WL 113949

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff could state a claim under ERISA § 406(b)(1) based on allegations that trustee of employee stock ownership program voted plan-owned shares of company stock to reconstitute company’s board of directors
  • “[T]he statute’s use of the term ‘management’ cannot logically be limited to the ‘investment’ of Plan assets.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nordberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.