Skip to main content
· 5/3/1994

O'Neill v. City of Auburn

Citations

  • 23 F.3d 685
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10113
  • 1994 WL 172278

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering a lack of a contract between the general contractor and subcontractor as evidence of no duty under section 414
  • enumerating circumstances that establish the requisite retention of control to establish general contractor’s duty to an independent contractor
  • considering a lack of a contract between the general contractor and subcontractor as evidence of no duty under section 414

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Leval, Pollack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.