O'Neil v. Waller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concurring opinion asserting that “facts” which come only from brief should not be considered even as background
• plurality opinion stating that recitation of “facts” [quotation marks in original] in opinion come from allegations in appellants’ brief, although in reaching decision, court considered no “facts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).