Skip to main content
· 3/8/1988

O'NEIL v. Picillo

Citations

  • 682 F. Supp. 706
  • 18 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20893
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2737
  • 1988 WL 26752

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “defendants must demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that ‘a totally unrelated third party is the sole cause of the release’ ”
  • third-party defense will not apply when equally likely that third-party was or was not solely responsible for contamination
  • discussing Rohm & Haas’s liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pettine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.