O'NEIL v. Marriott Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in a “close question,” no security found to exist because (1) plan’s staggered vesting requirements made benefits dependent on length of service, (2) significant plan profits derived from other employees withdrawing from the plan before becoming fully vested, (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).