Skip to main content
· 10/27/2005

Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. Madison County

Citations

  • 401 F. Supp. 2d 219
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25287
  • 2005 WL 2810537

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that because the RPTL provides a two-year redemption period, “in order to comport with due process [Madison] County must have given the Nation notice two years prior to expiration of the redemption period”
  • “It is of no moment that 8 the . . . suit at issue here is in rem . . . [w]hat is relevant is that the [c]ounty is 9 attempting to bring suit against the tribe.”
  • setting forth procedural history of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hurd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.