Skip to main content
· 4/2/2024

Oneal v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “district court did all that it could by requesting that the [foreign] court continue to treat the documents as confidential” (emphasis added)
  • factor in granting modification was that the discretion on admissibility of documents remained with German court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.