O'Neal v. State
Citations
- 2023 ND 109
Syllabus
A district court's order denying a post-conviction relief application based on newly discovered evidence and ineffective assistance of counsel is affirmed. To succeed on a post-conviction relief claim based on newly discovered evidence a defendant must show 1) evidence was discovered after trial, 2) the failure to learn about the evidence was not the result of defendant's lack of diligence, 3) the newly discovered evidence was material to the issues, and 4) the weight and quality of the evidence would likely have resulted in an acquittal. To prove post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel an applicant must 1) show that counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and 2) show that there was a reasonable probability that, but for the counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of proceeding would have been different.
Judges: Crothers, Daniel John
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Heckelsmiller v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-10-12· cited 72×
- Flanagan v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-04-19· cited 41×
- Klose v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-11-09· cited 36×
- Bahtiraj v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-12-19· cited 29×
- Kovalevich v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-07-18· cited 16×
- Roe v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-03-30· cited 8×
- O'Neal v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-06-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.