One Pacific Place, Ltd. v. H.T.I. Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court would not consider defendant’s argument concerning possible setoff because it was not pled in answer, as required by § 25-812
• relief should be confined to that prayed for and that justified by averments of pleadings; pleadings before trial court at time of decision form issues for that decision
• landlord’s entitlement to possession of premises moot where tenant gave up possession of premises

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).